If you’ve watched Chelsea this season—under the chaotic tenure of Enzo Maresca, the brief reign of head coach Rosenior, and now Calum Macfarland’s interim charge—you’ve probably noticed one thing: set pieces are either a lifeline or a liability. For a young squad, you’d expect dead-ball situations to be a strength. But the reality is more complicated. Whether you’re writing for fan media like The Shed End Review or just trying to sound smarter in the pub, breaking down Chelsea’s set-piece play requires a systematic approach. Here’s a practical checklist to dissect corners, free kicks, and defensive organization—so you can spot patterns, not just panic.
Step 1: Start with the Personnel—Who’s on the Ball and Who’s in the Box
Before you look at the delivery, know your takers and targets. Chelsea’s set-piece rotation has shifted this season, and it’s not just about Cole Palmer curling one in from the left. Here’s a quick reference table based on observable match footage from the 2025/26 Premier League season:
| Player | Role in Set Pieces | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Cole Palmer | Primary corner/free-kick taker | Prefers inswinging deliveries from right; often targets near post |
| Enzo Fernandez | Secondary taker, deep free kicks | Uses lofted balls for far-post runs; effective from central areas |
| Moises Caicedo | Short option, decoy runner | Rarely takes, but creates space by dragging markers |
| Levi Colwill | Primary aerial target | Best leap in squad; often left unmarked due to defensive focus on Palmer |
| Liam Delap | Target for near-post flicks | Physical presence; draws fouls in dangerous areas |
What to watch: When Palmer takes a corner from the right, watch for Colwill peeling off his marker at the far post. If Enzo steps up from a central free kick, expect a lofted ball to the back stick where Joao Pedro or Delap is lurking. If the delivery is short, Caicedo often receives and plays it back—this is a pattern Macfarland has used to reset possession.
Step 2: Map the Delivery Zones—Corners Are Not All the Same
Don’t just count corners; categorize them. Chelsea’s success from dead balls depends on where the ball lands. Based on match observations from the 2025/26 season, here’s a breakdown:
- Inswinging corners (right-footed from right, left-footed from left): These account for a majority of Chelsea’s corners. Palmer’s inswingers from the right are dangerous because they curve toward the six-yard box, forcing the goalkeeper to decide between coming out or staying put.
- Outswinging corners: Used less frequently, usually by Enzo from the left. These are aimed at the penalty spot for a header back across goal. They’re less effective because Chelsea’s smaller players (like Pedro Neto or Estevao) struggle to win the first ball.
- Short corners: Used occasionally. Chelsea uses these to break defensive shape, often with Moises Caicedo or Reece James as the short option. It’s a safe play but rarely leads to a direct shot.
Step 3: Evaluate the Defensive Setup—Where Chelsea Leaks Goals
Chelsea’s defensive set pieces are a bigger concern. With a young backline—Colvill, James, Cucurella, and Chalobah—organization is inconsistent. Here’s a checklist for analyzing their vulnerability:
- Zonal vs. man-marking: Under Macfarland, Chelsea uses a hybrid: four players in a zonal block near the six-yard box (usually Colvill, James, Cucurella, and a midfielder), while Delap and Joao Pedro man-mark the most dangerous opponents. This leaves gaps in the middle.
- The near-post gap: Watch for this pattern—it’s a recurring weakness.
- Second balls: Chelsea struggles to clear the first header. Against set-piece specialists, they often lose the rebound.
Step 4: Track the Tactical Adjustments—From Maresca to Macfarland
Set-piece tactics change with the manager. Here’s how the season’s shifts have affected Chelsea’s dead-ball play:
- Under Maresca (start of season): He favored short corners and intricate routines, treating set pieces like attacking moves. This had mixed results in the Premier League because opponents pressed the short option aggressively.
- Under Rosenior (mid-season): A more direct approach—lots of inswingers to Colwill and Delap. Conversion rate appeared to improve, but defensive organization worsened because Rosenior didn’t drill zonal marking.
- Under Macfarland (April 2026 onward): The interim manager has simplified things. He’s using more outswingers to avoid goalkeepers, and he’s assigned Caicedo to guard the near post on defense. Early signs are mixed.
Step 5: Create a Fan Media Checklist for Your Readers
Here’s a condensed version you can use in your next Shed End Review article or video breakdown. Share this with your audience so they can analyze set pieces during matches:
- Pre-match: Check the lineup for set-piece specialists (Palmer, Enzo) and aerial threats (Colwill, Delap).
- During corners: Note the delivery type (in/outswinger, short) and target (near post, far post, penalty spot).
- During free kicks: Is it a direct shot (Palmer) or a cross (Enzo)? Who’s in the wall?
- Defensive moments: Watch for the near-post gap and second-ball recovery.
- Post-match: Count set-piece chances vs. goals. Is the conversion rate improving?
Conclusion: The Takeaway for Chelsea Fan Media
Chelsea’s set-piece analysis for the 2025/26 season boils down to three truths: they have the talent (Palmer’s delivery, Colwill’s heading), but they lack consistency (defensive lapses, managerial turnover). For fan media writers, the key is to avoid blanket statements like “Chelsea are bad at set pieces” and instead ask: Why are they bad? Is it the delivery, the targets, or the defensive setup? Use the checklist above, reference match footage, and cite stats from official sources like the Premier League or Transfermarkt. Your readers will thank you for the depth—and you’ll sound like a tactical analyst, not just a fan with a hot take.
Related reads: